Thursday, February 15

Drinking the Kool-Aid

Are you familiar with the term "Drinking the Kool-Aid"?  It means blindly believing and following something that is foolish and wrong.  We recently saw a documentary on the People's Temple cult.  It was a socialist cult led by Jim Jones in the 1970's that ended when 909 members, 304 of them
children, committed suicide by drinking Kool-Aid poisoned with cyanide.  Now, it appears to be true that some of the parents forced their children to drink, and others may have been forced by men with guns obeying Jim Jones orders.  However, the majority it seems, drank the Kool-Aid of their own free will.  Were those people Martyrs?  No.  Not in the strict sense.  They were not put to death because others found their beliefs to be abhorrent.  They committed suicide, or were murdered.  Yes, it was a result of their beliefs, but they were not martyrs.

A martyr is someone who is murdered because someone else objects to them believing what they believe, and objects strong enough to kill them over it.  It is important to distinguish this from others who die because of their actions, such as the hijackers on 911.  They were not martyrs, they took their own lives while murdering others.

In John 21, Jesus speaking to Peter says "Most assuredly, I say to you, when you were younger, you girded yourself and walked where you wished; but when you are old, you will stretch out your hands, and another will gird you and carry you where you do not wish.”  This He spoke, signifying by what death he would glorify God."
And in 2 Timothy 4 Paul says "I am already being poured out as a drink offering, and the time of my departure is at hand. I have fought the good fight, I have finished the race, I have kept the faith."
History records that Peter and Paul were both martyred for their faith in Christ.  So how did they die?  Not really sure.  In works such as The Acts of Peter [end of 2nd century]
and the Apostles [except for John] we find some stories about their death, but there is question over whether the accounts are historical or metaphorical, but really, the exact method of their deaths is not all that relevant.  Oh, I guess it may be inspiring if Peter refused to be crucified right side up and was instead crucified upside down because he wasn't worthy to die like his Savior [and it is fair to note that there are historical accounts of people being crucified upside down] but the particularly heinous nature of his death [read sometime of the heinous death of Sir William Wallace] really doesn't tell us a lot about the truth of what he believed.

Of interest in this post is that the truth of Christianity is often argued from the martyrdom of the Apostles.  The argument goes like this:  The Apostles all died for their faith, so we can know from that it is true."  Is that a convincing argument to you?  It is often tempting to quote an argument we've heard that we don't really understand, and although occasionally you can win a point that way, it is most common that you cannot.  This argument for instance.  In response, skeptics reply, “Although not common, it is not unheard of for people to die for religious beliefs today, just as the 911 terrorists did. Just because someone is willing to die for a belief, doesn’t make that belief true.” 

What do you think about that?  Should we accept the deaths of the 911 attackers as evidence that
Islam is true?  No?  What about the followers of Jim Jones? No?  Why not?  They were really committed to their belief system weren't they?  Are you so committed to your beliefs that you would willingly sacrifice your life in such a dramatic fashion?  Maybe, maybe not, but I really believe that is the wrong question.  A better question is not "how committed were they", but "Does dying for a belief mean that belief is true?"  Nah, I don't buy it either.

 So why even talk about the martyrdom of the Apostles?  Is there anything we can learn from their deaths?  Yes!  Absolutely!  I submit to you that the horrific deaths of the Apostles as they were murdered for believing Jesus rose from the dead, is not proof that Jesus did rise, but it is proof that these men themselves did believe he rose.  They believed they saw and talked to the risen Son of God.

"Okay, so they really believed it, what does that matter?" you ask.  Their belief goes to integrity which DOES inform us about the veracity of their eyewitness testimony.  You see, if a man tells you he loves his wife more than anyone or anything in the world, and then, at some point she is kidnapped and he can save her life for $10,000, but he says "$10,000, are you kidding me?" and lets her die, that makes his declaration of love suspect.

Back to the Apostles.  They died proclaiming that they truly saw the risen Christ.  They wrote about what they saw, they followed what they taught, all their lives, it truly was a matter worth dying for to them.  This is unlike other witnesses.  The Three Witnesses to the book of Mormon for instance.  All 3 of them, at some later point repudiated Mormonism.  Not what you'd expect from men who are witnesses to the truth of the founding of a true religion is it?

You see, the proper benefit we gain from learning of the martyrdom of the Apostles is that these eyewitnesses didn't just talk the talk, they walked the walk, and if they had been imposters, lying about Jesus, it is unreasonable to believe that they would all be willing to live a life of suffering and finally Martyrdom all on account of that lie.

12 comments:

  1. I really enjoyed this post because this I think that this distinction is vitally important.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I liked this post because it explained the true meaning of what a martyr is.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Where we live "the bible belt" it is very easy to get away with talking the talk. Back then with all the persecution in the biblical times it wasn't easy to talk the talk much less walk the walk. For the disciples it took a lot of faith to live the way they did. They made a lot of sacrifices for something they believed in so much. It humbles me to think how easy sometimes we have it as Christians.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This post was another great reminder(for me) of how we should follow Christ as Christians. The apostles followed Jesus to their death. They became martyrs. This fact also validates the reality of the gospels because why would people die for something they don't truly believe in?

    ReplyDelete
  5. In the post you say that the belief of the apostles informs us of the veracity of their eyewitness testimony... however are not the beliefs of one who kills themself for a cause, based on this logic, just a valid?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Brie, It doesn't seem like you read the post closely enough. That was my whole point. The fact someone dies for their beliefs does NOT mean those beliefs are true, but it does mean THEY BELIEVE those beliefs are true. Hence the conclusion that the deaths of the apostles for Christianity does not mean Christianity is true, but it does mean that they weren't knowingly lying about their eyewitness accounts. They did believe they saw the risen Christ, ALL of them believed it enough to give the rest of their lives for it.

      Delete
  6. Anyone can die for everything, that doesn't make it true. great post

    ReplyDelete
  7. Good post, I always just viewed that if you're willing to die or comment suicide for something than it must be true. In a way I guess that's me drinking the Kool-Aid. I got some ideas now. Again, good post.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I like how you started off with the idea of "drinking the kool-aid" and transitioned to the real topic for this post.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Martyrs could never be people who just drink the kool aid because they are willing to die for what they believe. Great post!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Very interesting post!

    ReplyDelete
  11. I never thought about this before, amazing post gives me a lot of insight in case of somebody I’m talking to brings up this argument. Great post, thank you!

    ReplyDelete